In the dynamism of a Creative Faithfulness

Guidelines Proposed by Previous General Chapters

Mexico 92; Assisi 95; Ariccia 98.

  Introduction

          A general chapter permits us to rethink the institutional reality with a view to reciprocity and administration. It is this exercise of institutional and fraternal responsibility that characterises consecrated life, especially our own, as Conventual Franciscans. During the chapter we experience the active docility of the Spirit, which speaks within and through the brothers in order to build a mission which belongs to everyone. The reflections and exchanges of different points of view invite us to work in relation to the diversity of experiences that are taking place within the order and place us in a position of dialogue with respect to the challenges and proposals that are forthcoming from the different realities in which we operate. It is time to open up to the greatest expression of dialogue and joint institutional and charismatic responsibility.

            It is self-evident that each of the regions and jurisdictions that make up the order contributes its own characteristics and peculiar style. For this reason, in this climate of dialogue and communication, the diversity of the different parts of our institution open up to the meeting with the others, decentralising themselves from their regional peculiarities in order to place themselves in the service of the greater reality of the order, seeking answers that are capable of creating dialogue with the cultural diversities that we represent. This practice of reciprocity and interdependence is a permanent invitation to transcend peculiarities to respond in a concrete manner to the enculturation of charisma in an ecclesiology of communion, open to the action of the Spirit. The presence of the order thus constitutes itself as a unique answer which is at the same time different for each reality, united in a reciprocal relationship. Each general chapter expresses the vocation of unity and communion which animates and promotes the incarnation of the charisma, or the ‘cultural re-establishment of the charisma’ as an event of the Spirit in the service of the Kingdom.

            In order to understand the dynamism of charisma in the institution, we shall begin from the documents created by the previous general chapters: “The presence and testimony of Conventual Franciscans approaching the year 2000”, “Justice, Peace and safeguarding creation” and “The study of Franciscan charisma in its various stages of formation” Mexico 92[1]; “Documentum capitulare programmaticum at futurum sexenium”Assisi 95[2] and “The formation of the order, guidelines for a renewed commitment” Ariccia, Roma 98[3]. These documents permit us to encounter the priorities of the Conventual Franciscan mission; the fundamental guidelines that have oriented us over the last few years; the urgent need for a renewed commitment in the field of formation. In particular, we must take into account and introduce in the analysis and memory of this last decade, the apostolic exhortation “Vita consecrata” by John Paul II, written in March ‘96, which offers us the teaching of the the characteristics and certainties of the ecclesiastic identity of consecrated life.

            Therefore, in this day of reflection, it is opportune to take a look at our reality and the future horizon of this recently initiated third millennium, with fraternal and critical adherence to the documents that we have produced recently under the orientation of the apostolic exhortation, so that we may “deepen the great gift of consecrated life” (n. 13) and carry out with “dynamic faithfulness” (n. 37) our mission in the Church. With a constructive spirit, it is our desire to participate in this commitment, through this itinerary. [4]

            In this presentation, we shall refer to Conventual Franciscan charisma in its most recent identity, configuration or actualisation, beginning from these documents, illustrating the most important historical facts and the manner in which the elements or components of charisma are proposed. Primarily, we will participate in the debate on charisma, creative faithfulness and on re-foundation, themes relative to the theology of religious life that concern the great majority of congregations and institutions of consecrated life.

            1. The dynamism of Charisma.  

            Charisma is a ‘free gift of God’, ‘a word that God wishes to give to the world’, these gifts of God encounter each other, they illuminate each other, interpret and reciprocally recognise each other within the social and ecclesiastic relationship. The specific gift of consecrated life opens up to the mission in the Church and makes itself felt in history.

            Now, charisma is a dynamic reality, in movement, open to new manifestations, always united with the founding inspiration. The apostolic exhortation‘Vita Consecrata’ speaks of ‘creative faithfulness’ when it says: “Institutions are therefore invited to repropose with courage the initiative, inventiveness and holiness of the founders, as an answer to the signs of the times that are emerging in today’s world” (n. 37). The problem of the actualisation of charisma or, as it is called today, the ‘refoundation’ of an institution, is represented for us as the reappropriation of the original intentions and profound values inherent to the spirit or soul of the charisma itself.

            Creativity has never been lacking throughout history, and many reforms, renovations or refoundations have been produced as a consequence of the different interpretations and answers to the signs of the times, and also because of the decadent forms of the model of religious life. Only with new solutions that are reborn in the light of the Word of God, will it be possible to discern the signs of the times, the orientation towards which our Order must address itself, under the inspiration of the Spirit, overcoming the temptation to take refuge in the past or in the structures which were once valid expressions of the charisma and the Franciscan mission.

            The word ‘refoundation’ is used repeatedly, in an almost official way, to indicate the union of the superiors general in its contributions to the synod on consecrated life celebrated in 1994[5]. The word indicates the intention to respond to the fundamental problems and to the crisis that is investing consecrated life, since it is not a question of just adjusting the different jurisdictions or external forms, but rather of what ensnares the identity and to an even greater extent, the visibility of its specific evangelising mission, within the mission of the Church. There is a lot of resistance and there are many fears in connection with speaking about the refoundation of consecrated life, nevertheless, within the ambit of a general chapter, these fears should not induce us to flee from the purpose of considering the theme of the identity of consecrated life, and specifically, that of Conventual Franciscan consecrated life. It is not a question of founding anew or of reinventing what already exists, but of recovering the original intentions, the spirituality of the charisma and of giving new meaning to its mission in today’s world. It is a question of reliving our own founding charisma with renewed enthusiasm.[6]

            According to what has been said ‘refoundation’ means to change or initiate a correction of the actual model. This movement does not promote schism, but on the contrary, brings new vigour to the institutional continuity and its process of memory. The important thing is to avoid turning back to the past, although we reaffirm the founding principles, which were the origin and the elements of development of the institutional course of the order in its historical Conventual Franciscan configuration. In many situations we must reaffirm existing foundations in order to carry out fully the renovation which has been initiated.

            Although charisma certainly remains over time ‘a gift of the Spirit’, it is no less certain that it must also respond to new realities and requirements of the Church and of history. It is flexible, it must understand how to create a dialogue with new realities and cultures, because what changes is not the original charisma, but the socio-cultural and socio-religious projections wherein the charisma is incarnated. All the changes that can be actuated must show a greater degree of meaning than what already exists and of what represents consecrated life. The task will not be to repeat, but to translate into practice, beginning with our own culture, the originality of the charisma in a context of historical continuity, with the Conventual Franciscan memory, in the new horizon, accepting the challenges that are presented. To rethink the organisation with its mission, beginning from its roots, to have the courage to discern what must be conserved of our history, what must be purified and what must be enhanced. [7]

            As a quick observation to deepen our reflection, we must overcome the ‘myth of the origins’ which, if it remains as a parameter of evaluation in our action, must not keep us away from the concrete history of the first steps of our brothers, the first institutionalisation, from its growth and development. These initial steps constitute the efforts to configure and enculture the charisma of the Order in society. Beginning from the convent, new proposals of evangelisation were put forward, a self-awareness of the charisma, a franciscanism that renewed itself and which conceived itself as a place where minority was lived in fraternity. Lastly, an ascetic and contemplative spirituality that expressed itself in preaching and in a socio-cultural presence, where the set of relationships and social-political relations, ecclesiastic-popular relations, became the privileged ambit of the begging presence. [8] The proposal is to avoid falling once again into the logic of faithfulness/betrayal, but to remain within a logic that discovers fruitfulness in practising creative faithfulness and in the successive institutional development of the charisma.

            Our job will be to remain open to new impulses from the Spirit, avoiding to close up introvertedly into ourselves in order to conserve our identity, tapping the impulse of the lifestyle of the first brothers, continuing in the course of institutionalisation through history of the Conventual minorite fraternity. This spirit will continue, modelling the life and mission in conformity with the co-ordinates  of space and time of the Church and the world.[9] In this sense we may say that it is always new and never ages because of the human comprehension, but continues to realise itself in a continuous synthesis of its contents, lived in an attitude of ecclesiastic sensitiveness and openness to contemporary cultural callings.

            2.-Recent orientation of the Order’s documents

            The question to deepen is: what is the content and orientation of the documents elaborated in previous chapters? And what should the variants be, that have to be taken into account, which we should strengthen at this particular historical moment, to seek creative faithfulness to the charisma, which would permit the spirit itself to become a living reality in its mission? Let us remember first of all the orientation contained in our documents.

            2.1.- Documents from Mexico.

            Proposals for a course of commitment and hope

            2.1.1.- In the introduction of its first document “The Conventual Franciscan presence and testimony towards the year 2000” the intentions and objectives of the brothers participating in the chapter are defined: “The impulse of the Order’s charisma - the objective of this extraordinary general chapter - constitutes the right and proper response to the concerns that are forthcoming from the Church...from contemporary society....from the desires expressed by a consistent number of religious. We are therefore convinced that the Order is called by the Spirit to increasingly seek originality and spiritual fruitfulness of the charisma of Francis of Assisi, to determine models of life and new institutional mediations to incarnate, in the most appropriate and meaningful way, the Franciscan charisma in the Church and in today’s world”.[10]

            Oriented towards reflection and discernment, with a view to a new evangelisation, the document clearly accentuates the need to meet again and repropose the spirit of the Seraphic Father, to continue with a presence that serves the Church and the world with his specific spirituality, incarnated in works, according to the times and the culture. Thus, it states: “therefore, more important that doing, is the spirit with which concrete works are realised”.[11]

            In this recognition of the original charisma, the characteristics with which it expresses itself in our Conventual Franciscan family are later mentioned: the evangelical Franciscan fraternity, minority, and conventuality. We assume these three characteristics as the specific style of our life and mission, aware of being, like Francis, Catholic and totally apostolic men. In order to incarnate positively and prophetically its charisma, the Order feels that it is called to seek adequate mediations and therefore calls for “being well-disposed towards renewal and, where necessary, courage, to abandon acquired positions and assume new ones”. [12]

            2.1.2.- The second document: “Justice, peace, safeguarding creation” is the answer of the capitularies, who were animated and stimulated by the example of Francis “renowned and venerated throughout the world as a symbol of peace, reconciliation and fraternity (Messenger of the Pope, 27.10.1996), and felt they were called by the situations of injustice and pain, by the risks of losing true peace and by the aggression against creation. They expressed their attention towards these problems with this document. The vision of reality is the first step in revealing the gravity of the situation in the world today, where the model of development is taken into consideration, the recent globalisation of means of communication, the inequality between north and south, the growing poverty and environmental deterioration, the trafficking of arms, racial, cultural and religious discrimination. All of this denounces the state of disorder throughout the world.

            The presence and actualisation of the Order is recognisable in the document with its various levels. It is advisable to maintain this dynamism and increment efforts in favour of this cause, offering some indications towards raising awareness and education, in concrete initiatives, and with the intervention in places where the roots of injustice and conflict often lie, feeling that we are “called to actuate, as much as possible, a prophetic presence in agencies of thought, in political institutions, in popular movements, in juridical institutions, and in those places where decisions are made, in the course of the peoples. In these areas we must be a critical conscience and give voice to those who have no voice, to defend the weak, the emarginated, the defenceless, to claim for them their right to life, work, a home... we too, stand before the world torn by injustice, hate and the devastations perpetrated against the planet, armed only with the “poverty” of our Franciscan testimony”. [13]

            2.1.3.- In the third and last document the general chapter deals with the them of “The study of the Franciscan charisma in the various stages of its formation” and the many areas of concern and the requests of teachers of the Order, with the objective of understanding the charisma, to incarnate it, from its very beginnings: “The return of creativity, of not being static, the return to our origins, or beginnings, to the primitive inspiration, the living, dynamic, existential scientific knowledge of our roots, our cultural patrimony, Franciscan thought, which conferred coherence and cohesion upon the Franciscan school, is today indispensable, as never before, to continue being faithful to our charisma and, consequently to initiate a serious and healthy renewal and relaunching of the Order”.[14]

            This study of the sources will be an inexhaustible resource for the creativity of the charisma and the personal impulse and growth of the community, bringing “the inspiring freshness, the transforming force, the interior dynamism, the prophetic message and their actuality”.[15] Thus, beginning from the first steps of formation, the concrete situation is presented at every stage, with its objective and purpose, its contents and possible themes, leaving the didactic and pedagogical creativity to the teachers, the methodology and the means to make it possible, exhorting them to essentially repeat the general orientation offered in the document, maintaining in all places the unity and graduality of communication of the charisma, remembering the importance of a good doctrinal and charismatic formation of the teachers.

            2.2.- The Document of Assisi

                        Common priorities to guarantee the goal of meaningfulness is reached

            Two texts were approved. The first of them was: “Documentum capitulare programmaticum ad futurum sexenium” and the second was: “Nuncius pro pace et vita fovendis

              2.2.1.-The chapter’s reflection is presented as the expression of the valorisation and re-interpretation of the faith as Franciscan religious, in the ecclesiastic, historical and cultural context in which we live. In the first part “Our Order today”, the document presents its willingness to create a dialogue between the values and the problems, concerns and hopes which are forthcoming from reality. In the realisation that the trends in current society contain not a few contradictions, since progressive secularism is countered by an accentuated religious desire, the primary value of the human person is hindered by frequent devaluation, due to a lack of respect for the person, and the aspiration of peace is hindered by armed conflicts. This reality is recognised and summarised in this manner: “This world is the place God called on us to confess, announce, celebrate his Kingdom, it is ‘our convent’, ‘our land’, ‘our Church’”.[16]

            The reality is perceived by the capitularies in its light and shadows, singling out primarily, among the lights:

            - the growing desire for an authentic minor and fraternal meaningfulness,

             - the course of self-comprehension and historical memory, characterising the values of the identity as minor Conventual friars,

            - the increase in the number of friars, thanks to vocational growth,

- the efforts of the missionary commitment, especially in Latin American and Eastern European countries, which has reinforced a new social conscience, expressed in testimony of greater Franciscan meaning, within the effectiveness of solidarity,

            - the presence of Assisi, with its specific services, which permits us to assume with responsibility the “spirit of Assisi” as part of our mission.

              The shadows that hinder our course:

            - The secularisation and dechristianisation that are investing various countries in the first world,

            - materialistic consumism, with its repercussions in our convents,

            - several of our presences in the First World are recording a certain fatigue, due to the lack of vocations and the advanced age of the brothers,

            - in the younger generations a certain insecurity concerning the vocation has been noted, in assuming stable commitments, and resistance has been encountered when it comes to ensuring serious permanent training,

            - lastly, fraternity life is menaced by individualism.

              To face these realities, the orientations of the ‘92 Mexico Chapter are reaffirmed and the address towards originality and spiritual fruitfulness of the charisma of Francis of Assisi is accentuated, to discern the lifestyle and new institutional mediations to incarnate this charisma. A Conventual Franciscan identity that can increasingly express itself in a meaningful and effective presence in the Church and in the world, through fraternity, minority and conventuality.

            The Option of the General Chapter is expressed with the following priority: formation with a view to testimony and a meaningful mission, and effectiveness in different cultures, through the following decisions:

            - to celebrate a extraordinary General Chapter on the theme:

            the integral formation of minor Conventual friars, for an encultured mission;

            - the development and in depth study of the document “the study of Franciscan charisma” from the general chapter of Mexico 92,

            - a better definition of the role of general assistants to the service of participation and dynamism in the central administration of the Order and

            - the drawing up of criteria and guidelines for the intervention of the central administration of the Order in Provinces with numerical and structural difficulties.

            2.2.2.- “Nuncius pro pace et vita fovendis”. The General Chapter manifests its desire to cooperate in the realisation of a culture of peace and life, together with all of the efforts that are being made in this direction. The inspiration is born of the life of Francis and his particular desire for peace. As Franciscans, the capitularies recognise that we have not always been coherent with this inheritance, for which forgiveness is asked, especially of the poor.            

           2.3.-The Document from Ariccia (Rome)

            The importance of the renewal of the Order, starting from formation.

            The General Chapter affirms, with its authority, that “an intense, clear and common commitment in the field of training constitutes a primary requisite and is indispensable to initiate the renewal of our consecrated Franciscan life, which the Church and the recent General Chapters (Mexico 92 and Ariccia 95) as well as the challenges presented in the world today, have requested of us with insistence”. [17]

            The Chapter wishes to animate and create awareness of the need for an initial and permanent formation that is well programmed and carried out, assuming it as a real priority and putting into practice with greater determination and faithfulness the norms, directives and orientations that have been made available to us. The document contains normative indications and exhortations, emanated by the Chapter as a legislative and animating organ for the Order. A series of operative motions are proposed with precision by various papers, offering practical indications for those who serve in positions of responsibility in the Order.

            In its structure the document prosposes a minimum level of formative stability, which accentuates the vital discovery of our Conventual Franciscan charisma in its various stages. The presence of new generations brings new solutions and also new problems. The formation for consecrated Franciscan life must assume a new task: responding to the challenges of the third millennium, interiorising the values of consecration, so that the unity between the consecrated life and the mission, between the interiority and the external activity of the brothers, is a concrete fact of the fullness of life. A formation which profoundly envelopes the person and transforms his personality during the process of assimilation of the charisma, and expresses it in a mission that actualises the peculiar characteristics of this charismatic inspiration, in a spirituality of the mission in the style that belongs to the Conventual Franciscan charisma. In this way the fraternity, minority and conventuality are manifested in our missionary style.

            Notwithstanding all that has been said in the document, in my opinion, a question remains open which has not been sufficiently stressed, which is the following: what relationship is there between religious life, society and culture? Or better: what characteristics should a training programme have, which is designed for enculturation? No part of the document speaks specifically of the encultured mission, as was requested in the document of Assisi.

            Without a doubt, the vocational and training problem is very complex and does not depend only on youthful and vocational pastoral efficiency, on meetings and educational projects to be evaluated, on young people to form or on official documents. The cultural changes and structural challenges that we are witnessing at the beginning of this millennium, the accelerated rhythm of transformations and the diversity of frameworks for the comprehension of life and history, induce us to educate today, thinking of consecrated life tomorrow, training is called upon to enculture the charisma in the friars, who must have the capacity to be creatively faithful. Initiatives are necessary which promote cultural exchange, which implement instances of circularity of thought, to attain a reciprocal enrichment, a formation in the spirit of internationality, training to live in an Order with diversity of presences and present in diverse cultures. The current cultural characteristic requires an intellectual and human qualification, to offer decisive and eloquent responses an an expression of the fertile force of the Spirit and the significant actualisation of holiness in the specificity of the charisma.

            How are we favouring the formation of an open, encultured mentality with the ability to entertain an intercultural dialogue in our initial and permanent training? We may seriously ask ourselves if the lack of vocations in some jurisdictions is not a sign of structural infertility due to the ageing of some forms of consecrated life or due to a lack of enthusiasm, living on the margins of Franciscan spirituality, diluted repeatedly in ministerial activism. In not a few communities, the option of evangelical values does not offer a fertile alternative and a prophetic style to models of life presented in society. Lastly, a sincere and honest question: What young people can create the option for us if they are conditioned by the oppressiveness of some structures to continue a certain model of life and/or service, which have lost evangelical meaningfulness, and do not offer a newness of life?  

           3.- Time for synthesis and building alternatives

            After having underlined several guidelines in previous documents, we Conventual Franciscans feel the need to take on new tasks:

            - to recuperate the guidelines elaborated in the previous General Chapters,

            - to deepen the relations presented in this Chapter, which express the experiences of the last six years,

            - to respond to the cultural challenges of the third millennium and the consumistic society that has globalised a single economic system and

            - think, as an institution, in terms of participatory corresponsibility.

            It is precisely in the ecclesiastic environment that we must rethink our identity of consecrated life, with a new sensitiveness and the services and presences, beginning from our charismatic inspiration. This is the theme of charismatic enculturation and refoundation. It will surely be convenient to seek new ways to consolidate some policies that have already been assumed for institutional restructuring and also for the rebirth of our prophetic option as consecrated lives, coming out of cultural emargination and from being distant from environments where political and social conflicts take place, to become a significant presence, as already mentioned  in the General Chapter of Mexico 92

            We must approach the ‘Conventual’ configuration of our Franciscan option with a greater degree of precision. Starting from the initial forms of Franciscananism, we now live a dialectic of “fuga mundi and commitment in the world”. Since the. XIII century Conventual minority has been carrying on a dialogue in the city, it has constituted itself as a new alternative and social model of integration and as a proposal of life beginning from a religious ideal. In a context of plurality of relationships, in urban centres that have developed, the convent served to announce Christian ideals. The Franciscan organisation has always stood out for its peculiar institutional flexibility and adaptation to new particular and local situations, for its apostolic vitality and ministerial service, for its criticism of fundamentalist attitudes in relation to the origins and in favour of the true integration of academic studies.

            The principle problems of Franciscan religious life are not theoretical in nature. They are practical problems relating to commitment and action. It will be necessary to move from words to action, if we do not want our dialogue to be converted into a pretext to defer changes in the service of a rebirth of the charisma. What are we willing to do to reach this objective?

           3.1.- The actuality of several themes and possible projections.

We are the children of a common project, the heirs of a charisma that has many years of history and experience and we are inserted in the same cultural processes. We share dreams and contradictions. We feel a sense of belonging to a family, to the Order, and in particular to our convents and provinces, culture and local Church. In this regard, the enunciations of several common themes may help us overcome a certain pessimism and fatigue, since the stress and strain of uncertainties or the discussion of some themes that are repeated does not facilitate the course of a communitary growth, and even less an institutional reconversion. For this reason I present following herewith several considerations that are present in the documents that we have dealt with, for consideration during this day of reflection.

            3.1.1.- Affinity between consecrated life and culture

            An immense job: the cultures represent a territory of mission. The specific values of consecrated Franciscan life lived in “obedience, without anything of our own and in castity”, must incarnate in diverse cultural situations, since there is no specific culture that has a perfect and exclusive adaptation to the values that are characteristic of our option in life. Franciscan life, like the Church itself, of which we are a part, transcends culture to become present in it, encountering in every culture a particular affinity. The enculturation of the charisma, with its evangelical values, must penetrate the interiority of the culture itself, to render the values fruitful and operate the changes in the cultural, social and political structures where it lives.

            The course of enculturation is always in relation to the social group within which the Franciscan charisma is expressed. It is a process of approaching the cultural world of another, which includes both the message and the messenger. In this relation, the messenger does not seek an identification with the other, first of all he is a listener of his brother, to perceive his line of reasoning and cultural logic, within the construction and perception of the sense of life. These two forms of enculturation of the message and the messenger are two permanent and profound processes. It is the reflowering of an autochtonous Franciscan life. It is not a question of having Asiatic or African religious if they are culturally alienated from a formation that is extraneous to their own culture. It is necessary to pass from a well thought out and consecrated life experience, starting from others’ cultural categories and the aboriginal cultural categories.

            Enculturation and incarnation. In the theme of enculturation a new, articulated anthropological knowledge is implied together with the mystery of incarnation. We reach the very heart of the Church and Franciscan charisma. This process has been produced when consecrated life was incarnated in the western European culture. The point of departure is not a cultural matrix, but the Gospel, because the evangelising action is the development of a new cultural action. The charisma manifests no cultural preference because it desires to reach all cultures. The challenge is present in ad gentes missions, as well as in pastoral missions in our urban communities, and especially in the popular religiosity with which we are working.

            Enculturation: mission born of the charisma. Enculturation is not a substitute tactic to invade or occupy another with our Franciscan philosophy, it is a way to be Franciscans that places us into relation with others; the cultures and all of creation, beginning with the minorities, this is the way to be and operate in close relation with the central mystery of the faith (incarnation/kenosi/salvation). Neither is it a question of efficiency or missionary animation, it is a question that has a christological root, with an anthopology that guarantees the human rights of brothers who accept the Gospel, it is the visibility of a life that offers itself and gives itself with the same logic of the incarnation of the Word. It is strictly tied to the manifestation of the ‘cause of the other’. In addition, it constitutes an essential moment in the tradition of our thought that needs to be localised in the centre of the institutional project, where the other must prevail as a brother, and as a consequence, the service, the donation and consignment of oneself. This programme of life, this mature sense of freedom is what characterises the thought of the Franciscan school.

            3.1.2- Numerical growth, new cultural areas and institutional corresponsibility in the charisma in the service of ‘meaningful quality’

            Thanks to our recent mission experience, the Conventual Franciscans may speak of a ‘cultural rebirth of the charisma’, when they emerge as a personal gift of the brothers of other cultures and peoples. We are in a continual process of reappropriation of the charisma in new local cultures. When the charisma is reborn in a new culture, it is understandable that difficulties arise and certain awkwardness may come about with the Order as a whole. The recognition of the culture of brothers and the exclusion of a single way of thinking, will be capable of creating in the Order a climate of exchange and reciprocal faith, and correct mutual elements or circumstantial adhesions that obscure the vitality of the charisma.

            For this process of growth in the cultures of the south and in eastern European nations, the problem arises of ‘institutional corresponsibility’ oriented towards an authentic communion of goods and availability of new services, inserted in a new culture and open to the challenges that we are invested with as an institution of consecrated life. While the number of friars is in decline in several jurisdications, in others it is growing and developing in new realities with new cultures. This realisation presents us with a dialectic between: globalisation and localisation, world scale and enculturation, these are the great themes that the analysis of the numerical distribution of friars by conference proposes to us.

            We encounter a priority task: to grow numerically in a single place is not sufficient because it is necessary to grow with a new mentality, with a vision of participation in the problems of the Order. For example: from Argentina, with its peculiar culture, in an actual reality and with an institutional memory, I think of the institution of the Order of Conventual minor friars in a global vision. Therefore, it is not a question of reproducing our identity in an isolated manner, but to put ourselves in relation with diversity, beginning from our own identity. To act locally, facing global institutional problems, open to cultural reciprocity in the same charisma. It is a pluricentrical vision of the life of the Order, lived through a common institutional project. Several questions arise from all of this

            - What services of communion and participation must we fortify in order to make a corresponsible institution possible?   

            - In considering the interests of the Order and its reality, what institutional reconversion would be necessary locally or in the conferences?                    

            - What characteristics would a formative process need to possess and what model of Conventual Franciscan is offered in current formative processes?      

            - How do we create a common mentality, a common language or common themes within the Order, without reducing the importance of the localisation of the charisma?

            A reading of the statistics of our geographical presence and growth and the decrease in several jurisdictions challenges our ability to respond, which can be formulated with the following categories or words: meaningfulness of the charisma, participatory corresponsibility in the Order and prophetic, encultured mission. During this day of reflection, we may deepen our considerations on the ways to make our presence in the world more meaningful and incisive, in accordance with the requirements in different geographical areas.

            4.- In conclusion

            We live in times of great changes, challenges and hopes. This requires that we be lucid and committed to undelayable tasks. To be reborn with a spirituality that cannot be substituted in the Church, recovered from our adhesion to the charisma and preaching to evangelise, as a minorite Conventual family. We must grow in the commitment of the prophetic testimony, to leave behind us a certain indifference, which conditions us and which obliges us to a habitual conduct, to accept the challenge of a spirituality that permits grace to disperse all of its fertility, to change our life. If the motivation is lacking of a spirituality founded in the charisma, our commitment is lost in an enterprise without newness.

            The option for faithfulness to the sequel of Jesus Christ as a poor man, helps us to discover the centre of our consecrated life, it permits us to discover the shadows that have formed in the way and illuminates itself with revealed Goodness, to continue to live the call of the Spirit present and operating in the charisma, which indicates to us new frontiers and new structures

            Francis fought throughout his life to break with every form of dependency and free himself from everything that could suffocate his freedom, creativity and personal vocation to poverty. In a few words, Tommaso da Celano describes to us the interest that Francis had in returning to the primitive experience that always helps to animate every course that has as its goal the rebirth or the refoundation of the charisma.

             “Therefore he put away from himself all of the cares and uproar of human considerations which could be an obstacle to him, and although he had to temper the rigour that he once had, because of his sickness, he said: ‘Come, brothers, to serve the Lord our God, because until now we have done little or to no profit!’ He was not even bothered by the thought of having reached a goal and, persevering untiringly in his purpose of holy renewal, he continued to hope he could start all over again.” (1Cel 103. FF. 500)

               It is up to us to go from a glorious story to remember and recount, to a practice of faithfulness to build.

BIBLIOGRAFIA.

AA.VV., Formar hoy para la vida religiosa del mačana, Publicaciones Claretianas, Madrid 1991.

AA.VV., “Vita Consecrata”. Studi e riflessioni, Rogate,  Roma 1996.

ALVAREZ GOMEZ J.,  Vida consagrada para el tercer milenio. De la renovaci—n a la refundaci—n, Publicaciones Claretianas, Madrid 1999.

AZEVEDO M.,  I religiosi, vocazioni e missione, Ancora, Mil‡n 1988

CENCINI A.,  Vida Consagrada. Itinerario formativo,  San Pablo, Madrid 1994.

GOYA B.,  Formaci—n integral a la vida consagrada. A la luz de la exhortaci—n possinodal, San Pablo, Madrid 1998.

MARTINEZ DIEZ F.,  La frontera actual de al vida religiosa. Bases y desaf’os de la refundaci—n, San Pablo, Madrid 2000.

MAZZOTTA F., “Vita Consecrata”. Invito alla lettura dell’Esortazione apostolica, Dehoniane, Roma 1996.

REY GARCIA J.C., Preguntas sobre la vida consagrada. Doce cuestiones candentes, Publicaciones Claretianas, Madrid 1997.

ROCCA G., Il carisma del fondatore, Ancora 1998.

RUSSO G., Spiritualitŕ della Vita Consacrata. Commento spirituale all’Esortazione Apostolica post.sinodale, LDC, Leumann, Turčin 1996.


            [1] CAPITULUM GENERALE EXTRAORDINARIUM, in Commentarium Ordinis Fratrum Minorum Conventualium, 89 (1992) pp.376-421.

            [2] CAPITULUM GENERALE ORDINARIUM, in Commentarium Ordinis Fratrum Minorum Conventualium, 92(1995) pp. 221-231.

            [3] CAPITULUM GENERALE EXTRAORDINARIUM, in Commentarium Ordinis Fratrum Minorum Conventualium, 95(1998) pp.474-521.

            [4] Testo in italiano GIOVANNI PAOLO II, Esortazione Apostolica Post-sinodale, Vita Consecrata, L’Ossevatore Romano-Documenti.Roma 1996.

            [5] Cf. UNION DE SUPERIORES GENERALES.  Carisma en la Iglesia para el mundo. La vida consagrada hoy, Madrid 1994.

            [6] Cf. ALVAREZ GOMEZ J., Vida Consagrada para el tercer milenio. De la renovaci”n a la refundaci”n. Publicaciones Claretianas 1999. pp. 213-262

            [7] Cf. ROCCA G., Il carisma del fondatore, Ancora 1998. Il termine ‘carisma’ č molto usato. L’autore fa opera di precisazione terminologica e di chiarimento di contenuti. E’ un contributo per comprendere quanto la parala ‘carisma’ ha assunto un significato teologico tecnico. pp.35-85.

            [8] Cf. Il documento presentato al Capitolo Generale Estraordinario di 1998. Il Carisma Francescano Conmventual, storia e attuazione odierna, Facoltŕ Teologica S. Bonaventura, Roma 1998. Curia Generale ofm conv.

            [9] Cf. ALVAREZ GOMEZ J, o.c. pp.159-237

            [10] CAPITULUM GENERALE EXTRAORDINARIUM, 89 (1992) o.c.,   Presenza e Testimonianza francescana conventuale verso i Duemila, p.376.

            [11]Ivi. p.377

            [12] Ivi. p.381

            [13] Ivi. p. 404

            [14] Ivi. p. 406

            [15] Ivi. p. 406

            [16] CAPITULUM GENERALE ORDINARIO, 92(1995)o.c. Documentun capitulare programmaticum ad futurum sexenium,  p.222

            [17]CAPITULUM GENERALE EXTRAORDINARIUM, 95 (1998). La Formazione nell’Ordine. Linee per un rinnovato impegno. p.475.